ReleaseStatus Minutes 2009-02-02 IRC log

(14:56:53) ja_: Moin
(14:58:44) _Nesshof_ [n=_Nesshof@192.18.8.1] hat den Raum betreten.
(15:00:20) stefan_b: Moin!
(15:01:11) kai_a [n=Kai_Ahre@nat/sun/x-ee4accfca8137d6a] hat den Raum betreten.
(15:01:23) mdamboldt: Hi
(15:01:34) _Nesshof_: moin
(15:02:11) _Nesshof_: any comments regarding the 3.0.1 release last week ?
(15:02:27) ja_: de, fr, it, nl, en-US, pl, da, ru, pt-BR uploaded/released
(15:02:37) mla [n=ml93712@192.18.8.1] hat den Raum betreten.
(15:02:40) mla: hi
(15:02:57) _Nesshof_: 3.1 status:
(15:03:14) _Nesshof_: regular code freeze date was last week
(15:03:27) stefan_b: :-)
(15:03:29) _Nesshof_: currently I'm still nominating a few cws
(15:03:32) ja_: I'd like to get two CWSses integrated:
(15:03:41) ja_: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98399
(15:03:41) ja_: needs to be integrated to get the
(15:03:41) ja_: footnote numbers correct for Farsi language
(15:03:41) ja_: CWS kashidafix02 (approved by QA)
(15:03:48) IZBot: issue 98399: gsl PATCH VERIFIED FIXED P3 farsi missing in GetLocalizedChar()
(15:03:53) ja_: regarding Arabic numerals in footnote/endnote
(15:03:53) ja_: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98418
(15:03:53) ja_: swftnnumbers02 (ready for QA)
(15:03:59) IZBot: issue 98418: gsl DEFECT RESOLVED FIXED P3 Numeric Footnote and Endnote references does not Obey Context Option
(15:04:01) _Nesshof_: I'm looking at the diff of every cws to avoid that we get any new or changed strings
(15:04:27) _Nesshof_: ja_: both related to arabic ?
(15:04:32) ja_: yes
(15:05:49) _Nesshof_: if the fixes for these issues are not that risky and justified from the Arabic community as severe I would accept a cws containing these issues
(15:06:49) ja_: hmm... kashidafixes02 is already approved and the other CWS contains just this one issue...
(15:07:13) _Nesshof_: ja_: ok
(15:07:13) stefan_b: _Nesshof_, CWS swftnumbers containing issue 98418
(15:07:19) IZBot: gsl DEFECT RESOLVED FIXED P3 Numeric Footnote and Endnote references does not Obey Context Option http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98418
(15:08:06) stefan_b: Correcting: CWS name is swftnumbers02.
(15:08:53) _Nesshof_: ja_: do you have the proposal for the installation task priorities from last week at hand ?
(15:09:14) _Nesshof_: can we confirm the suggested priorities ?
(15:10:03) ja_: Sophie answered on this topic
(15:11:06) ja_: she can live with having issue 89394 implented for 3.2
(15:11:12) IZBot: gsl ENHANCEMENT STARTED P3 Start Center : allow the localization of the links http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89394
(15:11:22) ja_: /implented/s/implemented
(15:15:56) _Nesshof_: ok, any other issue regarding 3.1 ?
(15:16:17) UweL: meta issue cleanup
(15:16:42) UweL: what about issue 97159
(15:16:48) IZBot: Database access DEFECT NEW P2 Query doesn't work any more http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97159
(15:17:05) UweL: no action since mid december
(15:17:56) UweL: blocker or not?
(15:17:58) MechtiIde: UweL, yes because I had no time to create an example database system
(15:18:12) MechtiIde: for me it is a blocker, but....
(15:18:56) UweL: so we still have to wait?
(15:19:46) _Nesshof_: UweL: MechtiIde: we need a kind of confirmation or example so that frank can reproduce
(15:20:20) MechtiIde: _Nesshof_, I know it but I can't send our calculation database
(15:21:07) _Nesshof_: :-)
(15:21:32) _Nesshof_: anything else for 3.1 ?
(15:21:36) UweL: so how we go on?
(15:21:53) blauwal [n=jr93709@sd-socks-197.staroffice.de] hat den Raum betreten.
(15:22:00) MechtiIde: what happens with the nfs-mount on FAT
(15:22:09) _rene_: _Nesshof_: rptfix04 is still not ready, but simply because I didn't have time yet to package all the new versions and test system-jfreereport...
(15:24:06) _Nesshof_: _rene_: how much time do we need ?
(15:24:31) _rene_: undefined. I wanted to do it on the weekend, but then I needed to care about 2.4.1 miscompiled by gcc :/
(15:25:20) ja_: Mechtilde: do you have an issue ID ?
(15:25:27) _Nesshof_: ok, lets wait until it's ready
(15:26:08) MechtiIde: ja_, it is 97139 which wasn't a stopper for 3.0.1 but for 3.1?
(15:28:33) _Nesshof_: on discuss@ux there was a discussion to introduce a user ux_review to track those issues which requires input from User Experience Team. I Think we should support that idea
(15:30:07) ja_: _Nesshof_: +1
(15:31:05) _Nesshof_: we also need to think about doing a 2.4.3
(15:31:08) UweL: +1
(15:31:14) _Nesshof_: issue 91466
(15:31:27) IZBot: Presentation DEFECT VERIFIED FIXED P3 Bullets lost when loading in 2.4.1 http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91466
(15:31:33) _Nesshof_: and issue 96471
(15:31:40) IZBot: Database access DEFECT RESOLVED DUPLICATE P3 RPT: SRB created report saved as odt file when opened in 2.4.1 is blank http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96471
(15:32:36) _Nesshof_: especially 91466 is quite ugly and justifies a 2.4.3 release
(15:33:00) _Nesshof_: 6 issues in total for 2.4.3 : http://www.openoffice.org/issues/buglist.cgi?Submit+query=Submit+query&issue_type=DEFECT&issue_type=ENHANCEMENT&issue_type=FEATURE&issue_type=TASK&issue_type=PATCH&issue_status=UNCONFIRMED&issue_status=NEW&issue_status=STARTED&issue_status=REOPENED&issue_status=RESOLVED&issue_status=VERIFIED&target_milestone=OOo+2.4.3&email1=&emailtype1=exact&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=exact&emailreporter2=1&issueidtype=includ
(15:33:41) _Nesshof_: I suggest to talk next monday about a concrete time line
(15:34:24) _Nesshof_: anyhow: we can do a new milestone for the fixes now
(15:34:50) _Nesshof_: rtimm: RE duties this week ?
(15:35:08) blauwal: _Nesshof_: Kurt (kz) for OOO310 m1
(15:36:00) _Nesshof_: anything else for today ?
(15:36:51) _Nesshof_: by
(15:37:06) ja_: bye bye