Difference between revisions of "Joint Copyright Assignment"

From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Link to Pending JCAs)
(remove, disillusioned with point 2.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
It lurks at http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/jca.pdf
 
It lurks at http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/jca.pdf
 
A non-lawyer's view of this and it's reasonableness is provided by Michael Meeks (a non-Sun developer):
 
 
In my opinion the JCA is both sensible and reasonable.
 
1st - it is important to have a single owner for the OO.o codebase copyright
 
      to allow re-licensing in future. Ideally it would be owned by a neutral
 
      3rd party, but the existing situation works well because:
 
2nd - Sun does not (ab)use the re-licensing provisions available to them,
 
      indeed - quite the opposite they contribute all their changes to the code
 
      following the spirit of the LGPL much as anyone else would.
 
Furthermore, the JCA doesn't 'loose' you your copyright, just shares it.
 
Novell, RedHat and other corporations & groups have collectively signed
 
the JCA.
 
  
 
There is more good blurb about this [http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#usinglicenses] here for those that want to know more.
 
There is more good blurb about this [http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#usinglicenses] here for those that want to know more.

Revision as of 11:28, 4 October 2007

The Joint Copyright Assignment is a legal document you sign giving Sun, as well as your self, copyright to your contributions to OpenOffice.org.

It lurks at http://www.openoffice.org/licenses/jca.pdf

There is more good blurb about this [1] here for those that want to know more.

For JCA already sent and still awaiting for approval, please see the Pending JCAs section to post your enquiry and follow up.

Personal tools