Difference between revisions of "Talk:Documentation/How Tos/Calc: GAMMADIST function"
From Apache OpenOffice Wiki
(OOo uses scale not rate as third parameter) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Regina|Regina]] 23:24, 26 September 2008 (CEST) | [[User:Regina|Regina]] 23:24, 26 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Thank you! Non-italising e as you suggested: | ||
| + | |||
| + | :<math> \frac {(\frac x \beta)^{\alpha-1}\mbox{e}^{-\frac x \beta}} {\beta\, \Gamma(\alpha)}</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | and the cumulative fn: | ||
| + | :<math> \int_0^x\frac {(\frac t \beta)^{\alpha-1}\mbox{e}^{-\frac t \beta}} {\beta\, \Gamma(\alpha)}\mbox{d}t</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is that OK? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:drking|drking]] 08:00, 27 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:32, 27 September 2008
The description follows the ODFF draft spec, but OOo (and Excel and Gnumeric) calculate different. They use the third parameter 'beta' as scale parameter.
The density function in OOo is calculated as
Regina 23:24, 26 September 2008 (CEST)
Thank you! Non-italising e as you suggested:
and the cumulative fn:
Is that OK?
drking 08:00, 27 September 2008 (GMT)
